[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 94-2250
ANTHONY SOLIMINE,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
Selya and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
Anthony Solimine on brief pro se.
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and David S. Mackey,
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellees.
August 29, 1995
Per Curiam. The underlying district court action and
this appeal are essentially identical to appellant's other
district court complaints and previous appeals in Solimine v.
F.B.I., Nos. 94-1873; 94-1995 (1st Cir. Mar. 24, 1995). As
we noted therein, the underlying action is frivolous as it is
based on "an indisputably meritless legal theory." Neitzke
v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989).
Appellant's motion for oral argument is denied.
We summarily affirm for the reasons stated in the
district court's memorandum and order of dismissal dated
September 21, 1994. Loc. R. 27.1.
-2-