Solimine v. United States

October 26, 1995 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 95-1352 ANTHONY SOLIMINE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge] Before Selya, Cyr and Boudin, Circuit Judges. Anthony Solimine on brief pro se. Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and David S. Mackey, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee. Per Curiam. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal. We agree with the district court's conclusion that appellant's claim is based on "an indisputably meritless legal theory." See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989). We, therefore, summarily affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum and order, dated February 27, 1995. Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27.1. -2-