United States v. Ovalles-Figuereo

November 2, 1995 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 95-1716 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. FELIX OVALLES-FIGUEREO, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND [Hon. Mary M. Lisi, U.S. District Judge] Before Torruella, Chief Judge, Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges. Douglas J. Rose and Jarret & Mitson, Inc. on brief for appellant. Sheldon Whitehouse, United States Attorney, Margaret E. Curran and Edwin J. Gale, Assistant United States Attorneys, on brief for appellee. Per Curiam. Appellant-defendant Felix Ovalles- Figuereo appeals on the sole ground that the district court erred in denying his motion for departure from the applicable guideline sentencing range pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3553(b). "It is by now axiomatic that a criminal defendant cannot ground an appeal on a sentencing court's discretionary decision not to depart below the guideline sentencing range." United States v. Pierro, 32 F.3d 611, 619 (1st Cir. 1994), cert. denied, U.S. , 115 S. Ct. 919 (1995). It is clear from the transcript of the sentencing hearing that the district court did not misapprehend its power to depart. It made a discretionary decision that a departure was not warranted on the facts of this case. We lack jurisdiction to review such exercises of discretion. Id. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed. See Loc. R. 27.1. -2-