Young v. Hansen

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 97-1394 MAURICE D. YOUNG, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. JOHN HANSEN, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. Morton A. Brody, U.S. District Judge] Before Selya, Boudin and Lynch, Circuit Judges. Maurice D. Young on brief pro se. William R. Fisher, Ivy L. Frignoca and Monaghan, Leahy, Hochadel & Libby on brief for appellees. October 24, 1997 Per Curiam. Pro se plaintiff Maurice Young appeals a district court judgment that dismissed as frivolous his second 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint for damages allegedly caused by his wrongful arrest and prosecution. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). This court previously affirmed the district court's dismissal of Young's first 1983 complaint as frivolous. See Young v. Knox County Deputy, et al., slip op. no. 95-1064 (1st Cir. Oct. 17, 1995). Having thoroughly reviewed the record and the parties' briefs on appeal, we agree that this case essentially duplicates Young's first action. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is summarily affirmed. See, e.g., McWilliams v. Colorado, 121 F.2d 573, 574 (10th Cir. 1997); Hudson v. Hedge, 27 F.3d 274, 276 (7th Cir. 1994); Cooper v. Delo, 997 F.2d 376, 377 (8th Cir. 1993); Local Rule 27.1. -2-