Deemer v. Goynes-Clark

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-30624 Summary Calendar ROBERT DEEMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ROXIE F. GOYNES-CLARK; KIMBERLY LEMAIRE; WILLIAM L. KLINE; JOHNNY CREED; RICHARD L. STALDER, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections; STATE SELF INSURANCE FUND, Defendants-Appellees. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 98-CV-648-C -------------------- February 4, 2000 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Robert Deemer, Louisiana state prisoner #120219, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights suit as frivolous. He argues that the defendants filed false documents in a state-court proceeding, that defendant Stalder subjected him to rules that Stalder lacked the authority to enact, that he was denied access to the Administrative Remedy Procedure, that Stalder violated his right to equal protection under the law by * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-30624 -2- discriminating against him because he was housed in extended lockdown, that his good-time credits were improperly revoked, and that defendant Creed improperly failed to take administrative action and sanctioned the taking of Deemer’s property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Deemer’s complaint as frivolous. See Siglar v. Hightower, 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.