IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-30577
Conference Calendar
ROBERT DEEMER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
KELLY WARD; BECKY MOSS; BRAD ROGERS;
LONNIE NAIL; FRANCIS RASPBERRY; TOMMY
GARRETT; RAY HANSON; SHERMAN POWELL;
ANNE BRYANT; STATE SELF INSURANCE FUND;
NOLAN SLACK; FRANK HAMMOND; DAVID THOMAS;
C.A. LEWIS; SARAH BILBERRY; MILLS,
Lieutenant; MARK FOSTER; MARY HAMILTON,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 98-CV-1322
--------------------
April 13, 2000
Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Robert Deemer, Louisiana state prisoner #120219, appeals
from the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights suit as
frivolous. He argues that the magistrate judge should have
recused himself, that he was improperly convicted of an undefined
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-30577
-2-
prison disciplinary rule, and that he had been denied access to
the courts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Deemer’s claim that he was improperly convicted in a
prison disciplinary proceeding is barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512
U.S. 477 (1994), and is not cognizable in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983
proceeding. The district court did not abuse its discretion by
dismissing Deemer’s complaint as frivolous. See Siglar v.
Hightower, 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997). Deemer’s claims
that he was denied access to the Administrative Remedy Procedure,
that he had been denied privileges in extended lockdown, that his
good-time credits had been improperly revoked, and that he had
been deprived of his Scrabble game are not addressed by the court
as these claims are deemed abandoned on appeal. See Yohey v.
Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.