Curiel-Sanchez v. Trominski

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40700 Summary Calendar ARMANDO CURIEL-SANCHEZ, Petitioner-Appellee, v. E M TROMINSKI, Etc; ET AL, Respondents, E.M. TROMINSKI, District Director, INS; JANET RENO, US Attorney General, Respondents-Appellants. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CV-3 -------------------- March 17, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Respondendt-Appellant the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) appeals the district court’s grant of Armando Curiel-Sanchez’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas relief in a case controlled by this court’s intervening decision in Requena-Rodriguez v. Pasquarell, 190 F.3d 299 (5th Cir. 1999). * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. For the reasons set forth in Requena, we AFFIRM the district court’s determination that it had jurisdiction to consider Curiel’s habeas petition and we VACATE its determination that § 440(d) of the AEDPA** does not apply to criminal convictions which predate its enactment. The case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with Requena. AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART. ** Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. 2