United States v. Dixon

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 99-60458 Summary Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GLEN FREDERICK DIXON, SR., Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (4:98-CR-ALL-WS) _________________________________________________________________ July 7, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Glen Frederick Dixon, Sr., appeals his jury-trial conviction and sentence for stabbing Officer Bradley Alex with the intent to do bodily harm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 113(a)(3). Dixon contends the district court erred in enhancing his sentence three levels, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3A1.2(b), for resisting arrest. He claims the altercation did not occur during a valid stop because the officer did not have a warrant with him and was unsure whether there was one at the station. We review the sentencing court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo and accept its fact-findings unless they are * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. clearly erroneous. United States v. Rodriguez-Guzman, 56 F.3d 18, 20 (5th Cir. 1995). Of course, we defer to its credibility determinations. E.g., United States v. Sotelo, 97 F.3d 782, 799 (5th Cir. 1996). At the sentencing hearing, the court noted it had heard Officer Alex’s testimony at trial and found the offense occurred while Dixon was resisting arrest, indicating it believed the Officer’s testimony. Dixon has not demonstrated that this finding was clearly erroneous. Dixon maintains also that, prior to or during trial, the district court should have ordered, sua sponte, a mental competency examination pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241. We review such failure for abuse of discretion. United States v. Davis, 61 F.3d 291, 303 (1995). In his six-line appellate argument, Dixon alludes to testimony concerning his substance abuse and resulting impairment to his mental condition, mentions that his behavior at trial was erratic, and refers to an attempted suicide. However, Dixon failed to provide any citations to the record in support of these contentions. For an argument to be reviewed on appeal, it must contain citations to the part of the record relied upon. FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(9)(A). Because it is not adequately briefed, the issue is considered waived. See United States v. Gourley, 168 F.3d 165, 172-73 n.11, cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 72 (1999). And, because the suicide attempt, and resulting mental examination, occurred after trial, the district court could not have relied on it as - 2 - justification for questioning Dixon’s competency to earlier stand trial. AFFIRMED - 3 -