FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 05 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL TORRES BAUTISTA and No. 07-72945
YADIRA DOMINGUEZ DE TORRES,
Agency Nos. A095-178-011
Petitioners, A095-178-012
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 2, 2011 **
Pasadena, California
Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Daniel Torres Bautista and Yadira Dominguez de Torres, husband and wife
and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen based on ineffective
assistance of counsel. We dismiss the petition for review.
The petition for review is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it was
filed out of time. See Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2003) (noting
that the 30-day time limit for filing is mandatory and jurisdictional, and begins to
run when the BIA mails its decision to petitioner’s counsel of record).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
2