United States v. Sergio Mendez-Reyes

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 12 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10257 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:09-cr-02809-FRZ-1 v. MEMORANDUM * SERGIO MENDEZ-REYES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Frank R. Zapata, Senior District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted February 16, 2011 San Francisco, California Before: O’SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and CAMPBELL, District Judge.** Mendez-Reyes claims that his December 3, 2009 group-plea hearing violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and his Fifth Amendment right to due process. The record patently demonstrates that Mendez-Reyes was sufficiently * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Tena Campbell, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Utah, sitting by designation. advised of his rights, that he affirmed his understanding of such rights, and that he expressly waived such rights by pleading guilty. As we have held, any Rule 11 violations from this hearing were harmless, and the hearing did not violate due process. See United States v. Escamilla-Rojas, No. 10-10185, — F.3d — (9th Cir. 2011). AFFIRMED.