UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6150
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PETE NOBLE MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Pete Smith, a/k/a Jose,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen,
Jr., District Judge. (2:93-cr-00117-WO-1)
Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pete Noble Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Anna Mills Wagoner,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Pete Noble Muhammad appeals the district court’s
denial of his motion to terminate his supervised release under
18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2010). We have
reviewed the district court’s decision and have found no abuse
of discretion. See United States v. Pregent, 190 F.3d 279, 282
(4th Cir. 1999) (reviewing district court’s termination of
defendant’s supervised release for abuse of discretion).
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Muhammad, No. 2:93-cr-00117-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan.
24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2