FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 15 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PARVINDER SINGH; KAWALJEET No. 10-71489
KAUR SACHDEVA; JAPNEET
SINGH, Agency Nos. A099-873-204
A099-873-205
Petitioners, A099-873-206
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney
General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 8, 2014**
Seattle, Washington
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, RAWLINSON and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The BIA didn’t err in adopting the immigration judge’s adverse credibility
finding. The immigration judge listed “specific instances in the record that
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
page 2
form[ed] the basis of the . . . adverse credibility determination,” Shrestha v.
Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1042 (9th Cir. 2010), including Singh’s voluntary return to
India, discrepancies between the affidavits of Singh and his father, and petitioners’
inconsistent testimony regarding their place of residence and visa application
process. Nothing in the record “compels a contrary conclusion.” Singh v.
Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1100, 1105 (9th Cir. 2006).
DENIED.