Parmer v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

[Cite as Parmer v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2011-Ohio-2888.] Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us MATTHEW J. PARMER Plaintiff v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION Defendant Case No. 2010-08781-AD Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert MEMORANDUM DECISION FINDINGS OF FACT {¶ 1} 1) Plaintiff, Matthew J. Parmer, an inmate under the custody of defendant, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (DRC), filed this action contending his guitar was damaged while under the control of DRC personnel when his property was transported on or about March 5, 2010 from the Marion Correctional Institution to the Dayton Correctional Institution. Plaintiff requested damages in the amount of $250.00, the stated replacement value of his guitar. The filing fee was paid. {¶ 2} 2) Defendant filed an investigation report admitting liability for the property loss and acknowledging plaintiff suffered damages in the amount of $250.00. {¶ 3} 3) Plaintiff filed a response expressing his agreement with defendant’s investigation report in regard to damages. Plaintiff also requested reimbursement of the $25.00 filing fee cost along with his damage claim. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW {¶ 4} 1) In order to prevail, plaintiff must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant owed him a duty, that defendant breached that duty, and that defendant’s breach proximately caused his injuries. Armstrong v. Best Buy Company, Inc., 99 Ohio St. 3d 79, 2003-Ohio-2573,¶8 citing Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc. (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 75, 77, 15 OBR 179, 472 N.E. 2d 707. {¶ 5} 2) “Whether a duty is breached and whether the breach proximately caused an injury are normally questions of fact, to be decided by . . . the court . . .” Pacher v. Invisible Fence of Dayton, 154 Ohio App. 3d 744, 2003-Ohio-5333,¶41, citing Miller v. Paulson (1994), 97 Ohio App. 3d 217, 221, 646 N.E. 2d 521; and Mussivand v. David (1989), 45 Ohio St. 3d 314, 318, 544 N.E. 2d 265. {¶ 6} 3) This court in Mullett v. Department of Correction (1976), 76-0292- AD, held that defendant does not have the liability of an insurer (i.e., is not liable without fault) with respect to inmate property, but that it does have the duty to make “reasonable attempts to protect, or recover” such property. {¶ 7} 4) Plaintiff must produce evidence which affords a reasonable basis for the conclusion defendant’s conduct is more likely than not a substantial factor in bringing about the harm. Parks v. Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (1985), 85-01546-AD. {¶ 8} 5) Negligence on the part of defendant has been shown in respect to the issue protecting plaintiff’s property after he was transferred in March 2010. Billups v. Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (2001), 2000-10634-AD. Plaintiff has offered sufficient proof to establish his property was damaged while under the control of defendant’s personnel. Ward v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., Ct. of Cl. No. 2009- 09043-AD, 2010-Ohio-4955. {¶ 9} 6) Plaintiff has suffered damages in the amount of $250.00, plus the $25.00 filing fee, which may be awarded as costs pursuant to R.C. 2335.19. See Bailey v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (1990), 62 Ohio Misc. 2d 19, 587 N.E. 2d 990. Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us MATTHEW J. PARMER Plaintiff v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION Defendant Case No. 2010-08781-AD Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $275.00, which includes the filing fee. Court costs are assessed against defendant. DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk Entry cc: Matthew J. Parmer, #A557-849 Gregory C. Trout, Chief Counsel 4104 Germantown Pike Department of Rehabilitation Dayton, Ohio 45417 and Correction 770 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43222 RDK/laa 3/9 Filed 3/17/11 Sent to S.C. reporter 6/9/11