Having considered the petition and its accompanying
documents, we are not satisfied that our intervention by way of
extraordinary writ is warranted. As a general rule we will not review
challenges to evidentiary rulings by way of a mandamus petition because
these rulings are discretionary. See Williams v. Eighth Judicial Dist.
Court, 127 Nev. „ 262 P.3d 360, 365 (2011). Moreover, petitioner
has an adequate remedy at law by way of an appeal should he be
convicted. See NRS 177.015(3). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
veg.4-c
Hardesty
Douglas Cherry
cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge
Louis C. Schneider, LLC
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A e