IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
MARIE-CLAIRE HARPER PAGH, NO. 68731-0-
Respondent, DIVISION ONE
f>» o
o f> o
•c-
v.
2=»
ZO _ o
WILLARD GIBSON, UNPUBLISHED OPINION __>_!
-J
:<~ur~
3a.
Appellant. FILED: March 17,2014 3
• *
en
o
en zz~ J
8 Given our decision, we decline to address Gibson's claim that equity requires
us to address "the propriety of [Pagh's] actions in pursuing the garnishment,
controverting it once an answer was received, and the resulting cost to Gibson to file
this appeal for appropriate redress." Appellant's Reply Br. at 1-2. Gibson cites no
authority allowing us to consider equity in these circumstances, and such a notion is
contrary to the law, facts, and logic in this case.
-10-