COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: DJ Christopher Lowe v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01-14-00158-CR
Trial court case number: 10-DCR-055397
Trial court: 400th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend County
On August 15, 2013, the trial court certified that appellant had waived the right to
appeal as to guilt/innocence only, and that appellant had the right to appeal as to
punishment only. On April 4, 2014, the clerk’s record was filed in the above-referenced
appeal. On April 8, 2014, the court reporter, Karen Rothman, filed a one-volume
reporter’s record containing only the plea hearing transcript. However, the reporter also
filed an information sheet stating that appellant is appealing as an indigent, but that the
reporter was out sick on December 6, 2013 when the punishment hearing was held. The
reporter also stated that there was a dispute as to whether a record was actually taken for
the punishment hearing on December 6, 2013 and, if so, she has so far been unable to
locate the reporter who may have recorded that hearing.
Based on the reporter’s contention, it appears that a portion of the reporter’s record
— the punishment hearing — may not have been recorded or, if it was recorded, it may
have been lost or destroyed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(e)(2), (3), (f). Accordingly, we
abate the appeal and remand for the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing at which
a representative of the Fort Bend County District Attorney’s Office, appellant’s counsel,
Mark. W. Racer, and the court reporter, Karen Rothman, shall be present. At the trial
court’s discretion, appellant may be present for the hearing in person or, if appellant is
incarcerated, appellant may participate in the hearing by closed-circuit video
teleconferencing.1
1
Any such teleconference must use a closed-circuit video teleconferencing system that
provides for a simultaneous compressed full motion video and interactive communication
of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any attorneys representing the
The trial court shall have a court reporter record the hearing. The trial court is
directed to:
(1) Determine whether the punishment hearing portion was stenographically or
otherwise recorded or whether the presence of a court reporter was either
waived or otherwise not requested by the appellant;
a. If the punishment hearing was recorded, determine whether Karen
Rothman, or the court reporter who recorded such hearing, is able to
prepare, certify, and file a transcription of the punishment hearing;
b. If the punishment hearing was not recorded, determine why it was not
recorded;
(2) Determine whether any other testimony, argument, or proceedings from this
cause have been omitted from the reporter’s record filed with this Court on
April 8, 2014;
(3) If other testimony, argument, or proceedings from this cause have been omitted
from the reporter’s record on file with this Court, determine whether the
testimony, argument, or proceedings was or were stenographically or otherwise
recorded and whether the court reporter is able to prepare, certify, and file a
transcription of the testimony, argument, or proceedings;
(4) If any portion of the proceedings has been omitted from the reporter’s record
on file with this Court but can be prepared, certified, and filed by the court
reporter, order the court reporter to prepare, certify and file a supplemental
reporter’s record containing the missing portions of the proceedings, and
provide a deadline for filing the supplemental reporter’s record of no later than
30 days from the date of the abatement hearing in the trial court;
(5) If any portion of the proceedings has been omitted from the reporter’s record
on file with this Court and cannot be prepared, certified, and filed in a
supplemental reporter’s record, determine:
a. Whether the lost or destroyed portion of the reporter’s record is
necessary to the appeal’s resolution; and
b. Whether the lost or destroyed portion of the reporter’s record can be
replaced by agreement of the parties;
(6) make any other findings and recommendations the trial court deems
appropriate; and
(7) enter written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations as to
these issues, separate and apart from any docket sheet notations.
State or appellant. On request of appellant, appellant and his counsel shall be able to
communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the attorney
representing the State.
2
See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 52.046 (West 2013); TEX. R. APP. P. 13.1(a), 34.6(a)(1),
(d), (e)(2), (3), (f), 35.3(b), (c).
The trial court shall have a court reporter record the hearing and file the reporter’s
record with this Court within 30 days of the date of this order. The trial court clerk is
directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings and
recommendations with this Court within 30 days of the date of this order. If the hearing
is conducted by video teleconference, a certified video recording of the hearing shall also
be filed in this Court within 30 days of the date of this order.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s
active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the
supplemental clerk’s record and the reporter’s record of the hearing are filed in this
Court. The court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the
parties and the Clerk of this Court of such date.
It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes
Acting individually
Date: August 28, 2014
3