851. Petitioners bear the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary
relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228,
88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).
The documents before this court demonstrate that the district
court entered a previous order in July 2014, providing that the child would
remain with the parent not being deployed during the other parent's
deployment. NRS 125C.0665 allows an order regarding the custodial
responsibility of the child during a parent's deployment to be entered prior
to the deployment of the parent and provides that such an order is binding
on the court unless the standard for modifying custody is met. Having
considered petitioner's arguments and the documents before this court, we
conclude that petitioner has not met her burden of demonstrating that the
district court acted arbitrarily or capriciously. See NRS 34.160; NRS
34.320; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; NRAP 21(b). Accordingly,
we conclude that our intervention by extraordinary writ relief is not
warranted, and we
ORDER the petition DENIED.'
Pickering
Parraguirre
"While petitioner also asserts that the district court should have
held an expedited hearing on the motion under NRS 125C.0661, because
the hearing on her motion has since been held, this court is unable to
provide her any relief in this regard.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
cc: Hon. William S. Potter, District Judge, Family Court Division
David L. Mann
The Law Offices of Mandy J. McKellar
Eighth District Court Clerk
3