Clark Co. Dep't of Family Services v. Dist. Ct. (Marites C.)

P.2d 849, 851 (1991). It is within this court's sole discretion to determine if a writ petition will be considered. Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Petitioners bear the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Having considered the parties' arguments and the documents before this court, we conclude that our intervention by extraordinary writ relief is not warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. In particular, petitioners have failed to meet their burden of establishing that under Nevada law the juvenile court lacked authority to enter the reunification order while an appeal from the district court's order denying the petition to terminate real parties in interest's parental rights is pending. NRS 34.320; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Petitioners' reliance on Mack Manley v. Manley, 122 Nev. 849, 855, - 138 P.3d 525, 529-30 (2006), which held that an appeal divests the district court of jurisdiction to revisit issues pending on appeal, is misplaced because the reunification order arises from the juvenile court proceeding in District Court Case No. J316856, and that proceeding is separate from the district court parental termination proceeding in District Court Case No. D436469, from which the appeal arises.' Further, the juvenile court did not arbitrarily or capriciously exercise its discretion when it entered the reunification order as it required that a safety plan be put in place prior to Marites C.'s reunification with the child in an effort to protect the child from real party 'Because the appeal of the order denying the petition to terminate parental rights is pending in this court, we make no comment on the merits of that appeal in this order. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A in interest Travis C. Inel Game Tech, 124 Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558. We trust that the juvenile court will continue to monitor this matter so as to ensure the child's safety. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED. Piekt24 J. '4"c:24'k Pickering Parraguirre J. Saitta cc: Hon. Frank P. Sullivan, District Judge, Family Court Division Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division Special Public Defender Aaron Grigsby Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A