Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Petitioners bear the burden of
demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth
Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).
Having considered the parties' arguments and the documents
before this court, we conclude that our intervention by extraordinary writ
relief is not warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Smith, 107 Nev. at
677, 818 P.2d at 851; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. In particular,
NRS 432B.330(2)(c) provides that a child may be in need of protection if
the person responsible for the child's welfare caused the abuse or neglect
of another child who resided with that person. Here, the district court
concluded that petitioners failed to establish that B.L. was a child in need
of protection from real parties in interest, and petitioners have not met
their burden of showing that the district court's decision constituted an
arbitrary or capricious abuse of discretion or was in excess of the court's
jurisdiction. Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
, J•
Hardesty
4•S
Douglas
cc: Hon. Frank P. Sullivan, District Judge, Family Court Division
Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division
Special Public Defender
Stephanie M. Keels
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A 0