Sfr Investments Pool 1 v. Wells Fargo Bank

VACATE the order denying preliminary injunctive relief, REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss, AND REMAND this matter for proceedings consistent with this order. J. cit Jill__ ' J. aitta PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring: For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool I, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal. —cl/ara'Srt`t'isri Parraguirre cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Howard Kim & Associates Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A