VACATE the order denying preliminary injunctive relief AND
REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this order.
Plett tifte
' J.
Pickering
rja:P. J.
Saitta
PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring:
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool I, LLC v.
U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners
association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR
Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the
disposition of this appeal.
cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge
Howard Kim & Associates
David J. Merrill, P.C.
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A e