contain an NRCP 54(b) certification. Having considered the motion and
the documents submitted to this court, we agree that the appealed-from
order is not a final judgment. See NRAP 3A(b)(1); Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116
Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000). Because no other statute or rule
appears to authorize this appeal, we lack jurisdiction to consider the
appeal at this time. 2 See Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 100
Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984). Accordingly, we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
/
Hardesty
Douglas
2This order does not preclude any party from filing a new notice of
appeal from any future final judgment or other appealable order. In light
of this order, no action needs to be taken with regard to appellants'
October 28, 2014, motion. The relief sought in that motion, which appears
to seek a stay of a district court decision in a separate action and to join a
party in that separate action to the underlying action, is appropriately
sought in district court.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A Qfarly.
cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court
Hon. Robert E. Estes, Senior Judge
John Sayegh
Patricia Sayegh
Tiffany & Bosco, P. A.
Wolfe & Wyman LLP/Phoenix
Wolfe & Wyman LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1941A e