Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-14-00738-CR
IN RE Jerome JORDAN
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 29, 2014
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
Relator Jerome Jordan filed this pro se petition for writ of mandamus on October 22, 2014,
complaining of the trial court’s denial of his motion for speedy trial. Relator has been appointed
trial counsel to represent him in connection with his pending criminal charges. We conclude that
any original proceeding on the issue presented should be presented by relator’s trial counsel.
Relator is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se mandamus
petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id.; see also Gray v.
1
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013CR7589, styled The State of Texas v. Jerome Jordan, pending in the
227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Philip A. Kazen Jr. presiding.
04-14-00738-CR
Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-