dismiss, AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further
proceedings consistent with this order.'
J.
Pickering
J.
Saitta
PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring:
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners
association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR
Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the
disposition of this appeal.
cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge
Law Offices of Noggle Law PLLC
Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
'The injunction imposed by our April 7, 2014, order is vacated.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 194M