REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND
REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings
consistent with this order.
J.
Hardesty
J.
CHERRY, J., concurring:
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners
association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR
Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the
disposition of this appeal.
J.
cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge
Maier Gutierrez Ayon, PLLC
Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 194,A e