REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND
REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings
consistent with this order.'
J.
Hardesty
J.
Douglas
CHERRY, J., concurring:
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
US. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that respondent Nationstar lost its lien priority by virtue of the
homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize,
however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly,
concur in the disposition of this appeal.
Chut.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Stefany, Miley, District Judge
Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd.
The Castle Law. Group, LLP
Eighth District Court Clerk
'The injunction imposed by our October 18, 2013, order is vacated.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A (e-