REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND
REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings
consistent with this order.'
Hardesty
Douglas
D,7,4 J.
CHERRY, J., concurring:
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that respondent Nationstar lost its lien priority by virtue of the
homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize,
however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly,
concur in the disposition of this appeal.
J.
cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge
Law Offices of Noggle Law PLLC
Akerman LLP/Las Vegas
Miles, Bauer, Bergstrom & Winters, LLP
Eighth District Court Clerk
1 The injunction imposed by our January 22, 2014, order is vacated.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A