Grisham, 128 Nev. „ 289 P.3d 230, 236 (2012) (recognizing that an
agreement placed on the record is enforceable). Moreover, the record
reflects that appellant was represented by counsel below and we conclude
that there was no abuse of discretion as to the award of preliminary fees
or subsequent enforcement for payment. See Sargeant v. Sargeant, 88
Nev. 223, 227, 495 P.2d 618, 621 (1972); see also Shydler v. Shydler, 114
Nev. 192, 196, 954 P.2d 37, 39 (1998) (providing that this court reviews
district court decisions concerning divorce proceedings for an abuse of
discretion).
Finally, appellant argues that the district court improperly
ordered her to amend her complaint to add the third-party co-owners of a
business that was one-half community property. Having reviewed the
record and considered appellant's arguments, we conclude that appellant
has not established that this procedural development prejudiced her, and
thus any error was harmless. NRCP 61; Truckee-Carson Irrigation Dist. v.
Wyatt, 84 Nev. 662, 667-68, 448 P.2d 46, 50 (1968) (explaining that the
party asserting error bears the burden of proving that prejudice resulted). 1
For the reasons discussed above, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
Gibbons
Pickering
LAIR111__
Saitta
'Appellant also contends that respondent has not complied with the
divorce decree. To the extent appellant seeks enforcement of the divorce
decree, that claim should be directed to the district court in the first
instance.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A .4ger
cc: Hon. Jennifer Elliott, District Judge, Family Court Division
Karen Kay Powell Gunderson
Jamie Ray Gunderson
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1941A e