United States v. Private First Class RENALDO R. FEBRES

UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Before SIMS, COOK and GALLAGHER Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Private First Class RENALDO R. FEBRES United States Army, Appellant ARMY 20100436 1st Cavalry Division Matthew J. McDonald, Military Judge Colonel Mark H. Sydenham, Staff Judge Advocate For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Peter Kageleiry, Jr., JA; CPT John L. Schriver, JA. For Appellee: Pursuant to A.C.C.A Rule 15.2, no response filed. 27 September 2011 ---------------------------------- SUMMARY DISPOSITION ---------------------------------- Per Curiam: A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of two specifications of being absent without leave, two specifications of wrongful use of marijuana, and one specification of unlawful entry in violation of Articles 86, 112a, and 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 912a, and 934. The military judge sentenced appellant to a bad- conduct discharge, to be confined for one year, and to be reduced to the grade of E-1. Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, the convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as provided for eleven months of confinement and otherwise approved the adjudged sentence. The convening authority credited appellant with 212 days of confinement against the sentence to confinement. This case is before us for review pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ. DISCUSSION The convening authority action reads as follows: "only so much of the sentence extending to reduction to the grade of E1, confinement for eleven (11) months, and discharge from the service with a Bad-Conduct Discharge and, except for the portion of the sentence pertaining to a Bad-Conduct Discharge, will be executed." As such, the convening authority's action appears to be ambiguous in that he failed to approve any of the adjudged sentence. Accordingly, we will return this case in order to permit the convening authority to clarify his action. See United States v. Politte, 63 M.J. 24, 26 (C.A.A.F. 2006) (citing United States v. Scott, 49 M.J. 160 (C.A.A.F. 1998); Rule for Courts-Martial [hereinafter R.C.M] 1107(g). Conclusion The convening authority's action, dated 21 January 2011, is set aside. The record of trial will be returned to the same convening authority for a new action in accordance with R.C.M. 1107(g). The record of trial will be returned to this court within thirty (30) days for such further disposition or review as may be required. FOR THE COURT: MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR. Clerk of Court