FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IN RE A.L.C; E.R.S.C., Infants under No. 14-55671
the age of 16,
D.C. No.
2:14-cv-01506-
ANDREAS CARLWIG, ODW-SH
Petitioner-Appellee,
v. ORDER
SARODJINY CARLWIG,
Respondent-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted
March 2, 2015—Pasadena, California
Filed April 17, 2015
Before: Harry Pregerson, Ferdinand F. Fernandez,
and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges.
2 IN RE A.L.C.
COUNSEL
Matthew A. Fitzgerald (argued), Christopher Trible, and
Lauren Woods, McGuireWoods LLP, Richmond, Virginia;
Leslie M. Werlin, Dana Palmer, Molly White, Blake Olson,
and Truc Nguyen, McGuireWoods LLP, Los Angeles,
California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Philip D. Parrish (argued), Philip D. Parrish, P.A., Miami,
Florida; Lawrence S. Katz, Miami, Florida, for Defendant-
Appellee.
Erin C. Smith, Nancy K.D. Lemon, and Jennafer Dorfman
Wagner, Berkeley, California; Donald M. Falk, Mayer Brown
LLP, Palo Alto, California, for Amici Curiae Family
Violence Appellate Project, California Women’s Law Center,
Legal Momentum, Women’s Law Project, and Professor Jane
Stoever.
ORDER
Sarah Carlwig appeals the decision and order of the
district court sending A.L.C. and E.R.S.C., dual-national
American and Swedish children, to Sweden pursuant to the
Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child
Abduction (the “Convention”), and its implementing
legislation, the International Child Abduction Remedies Act,
22 U.S.C.A. §§ 9001–11. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291.
IN RE A.L.C. 3
We hereby vacate the portion of the district court’s order,
Carlwig v. Carlwig (in re A.L.C.), 16 F. Supp 3d 1075 (C.D.
Cal 2014), concerning the habitual residence of E.R.S.C.
IT IS SO ORDERED.