Smith v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-1013V Filed: April 8, 2015 Unpublished **************************** CATHERINE SMITH, * * Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer; * Trivalent Influenza or Flu Vaccine; * Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Administration; SIRVA; Special AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Processing Unit * Respondent. * * **************************** Michael G. McLaren, Esq., Black McLaren Jones Ryland & Griffee, P.C., Memphis, TN for petitioner. Julia W. McInerny, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 Vowell, Chief Special Master: On October 20, 2014, Catherine Smith filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq,2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration [“SIRVA”] caused by the trivalent influenza vaccination she received on October 5, 2013. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On March 16, 2015, I issued a ruling on entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for her shoulder injury related to vaccine administration [“SIRVA”]. On April 8, 2015, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation [“Proffer”] indicating petitioner should be awarded $76,000.00 “which represents all elements of 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2006). compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).” Proffer at 1. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award petitioner a lump sum payment of $76,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Catherine Smith. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 s/Denise K. Vowell Denise K. Vowell Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:14-vv-01013-UNJ Document 19 Filed 04/08/15 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ____________________________________ ) CATHERINE SMITH, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 14-1013V v. ) Chief Special Master Vowell ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Items of Compensation Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $76,000.00, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 1 Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $76,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees. Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN C. MIZER Acting Assistant Attorney General RUPA BHATTACHARYYA Director Torts Branch, Civil Division 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering. Case 1:14-vv-01013-UNJ Document 19 Filed 04/08/15 Page 2 of 2 VINCENT J. MATANOSKI Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division MICHAEL P. MILMOE Senior Trial Counsel Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/ Julia W. McInerny JULIA W. MCINERNY Senior Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 DATED: April 8, 2015 (202) 353-3919 2