Filed 5/7/15 P. v. Trujillo CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for
publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, D066180
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD235443)
JESSE OMAR TRUJILLO,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County,
Timothy R. Walsh, Judge. Affirmed.
Patrick J. Hennessey, Jr., under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for
Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
In October 2012, the San Diego County grand jury indicted Jesse Omar
Trujillo and two codefendants of numerous charges related to a scheme where the
men used stolen identities to purchase two homes. Trujillo pleaded guilty to one
count each of conspiracy to commit grand theft (count 1), using personal identifying
information of another (count 2) and forgery of documents (count 4). He also
pleaded guilty to two counts of filing a false instrument (counts 8, 17) and admitted
an allegation that the loss to the victims was more than $500,000. It was agreed
Trujillo would receive a five-year prison term.
The trial court later sentenced Trujillo to the upper term of three years in
prison on count 1, a two-year term for the enhancement, and concurrent midterms
of two years on the remaining charges. Trujillo received credit for four days of
presentence custody. The court imposed a number of fines and fees and ordered
joint restitution to the victim in the amount of $653,421.45. Trujillo timely
appealed. The court later granted Trujillo's request for issuance of a certificate of
probable cause.
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and
proceedings below. He presented no argument for reversal, but asked this court to
review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436
(Wende). We granted Trujillo permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has
not responded.
Our review of the record pursuant to Wende has disclosed no reasonably
arguable issues on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Trujillo on this
appeal.
2
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
MCINTYRE, J.
WE CONCUR:
MCCONNELL, P. J.
HUFFMAN, J.
3