UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1214
STANLEY GARDNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RAYMOND EDWIN MABUS, JR., Secretary of the Navy,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District
Judge. (2:14-cv-00352-AWA-TEM)
Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015
Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges. *
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley Gardner, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Anthony Exley, Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Wyneva Johnson, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
* The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2012).
Stanley Gardner appeals the district court’s order granting
Defendant’s summary judgment motion on Gardner’s employment
discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e–17 (2012), the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701 to 796l
(West 2008 & Supp. 2014), and the Age Discrimination in Employment
Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2012). On
appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Gardner’s
informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, Gardner has forfeited appellate review of the
court’s order. Accordingly, although we grant Gardner’s motion to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2