court's finding that SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, had not approved the
agreement beyond the expired deadline is supported by substantial
evidence and is not clearly erroneous. Id. at 672-73, 119 P.3d at 1257; see
NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev.
222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we deny the
petition. NRAP 21(b); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674,
677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991).
It is so ORDERED.
J
Saitta
J.
Pickering
cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge
Hawkins Melendrez, P.C.
Charles L. Geisendorf, Ltd.
Howard Kim & Associates
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 19474 7e97,