Opinion issued November 3, 2005
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-05-00891-CR
____________
IN RE CARL DOUGLAS HAYES, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Carl Douglas Hayes, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining, in essence, that the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles has failed properly to calculate his time credits. This Court has no mandamus jurisdiction over officials on the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004). Furthermore, relator has made no allegation or showing that mandamus is necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. Cf. In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Taft, Keyes, and Hanks.