NO. 07-05-0262-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
JULY 25, 2005
______________________________
In re: CARL DOUGLAS HAYES,
Relator
_________________________________
Original Proceeding
_______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
Carl Douglas Hayes applied for a writ of mandamus directing Charles Bacarisse, district clerk, to file an original petition he sent to Bacarisse. We dismiss the application.
We, as an appellate court, have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against an entity other than a trial court only when necessary to enforce our jurisdiction over a pending appeal. In re Soto , No. 07-04-0413-CV, 2004 Tex. App. Lexis 1751 (Tex. App.–Amarillo August 9, 2004, orig. proceeding); In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.— Houston [1 st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding). Given that Hayes seeks relief against a district clerk for omitting to file an original petition and that the matter does not affect a pending appeal, we lack jurisdiction to address the matter.
Accordingly, the application for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Brian Quinn
Chief Justice