|
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-06-025-CV
FORT WORTH & WESTERN APPELLANTS
RAILROAD AND CEN‑TEX RURAL
RAIL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
V.
PEREGRINE PIPELINE COMPANY, L.P. APPELLEE
----------
FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
----------
We have considered appellants= AMotion For Voluntary Dismissal.@ It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.
DELIVERED: March 16, 2006
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.