AT AUSTIN
NO. 3-90-240-CV
EX PARTE: JON DEAN PHELPS, RELATOR,
HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
PER CURIAM
This is an original habeas corpus proceeding by which relator Jon Dean Phelps seeks discharge from the custody of the sheriff of Travis County. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(d) (1988); Tex. R. App. P. Ann. 120 (Supp. 1990). Relator was committed to jail by an order enforcing child support obligation, which included a finding of contempt and order of commitment, entered by the district court of Travis County. Relator has filed in this cause a statement of the sheriff of Travis County that relator is currently incarcerated in the Travis County jail. Rule 120(b)(6).
Relator and Toni Rae Van Gilst (1) were divorced by a decree of divorce entered by the district court of Travis County on December 2, 1988. In pertinent part, the divorce decree ordered relator to pay $200 per month for the support of the parties' child beginning on December 15, 1988. The order enforcing child support obligation enters judgment against relator in the amount of $4,600; finds relator in contempt for failure to make payments in the amount of $200 each on March 15 and April 15, 1990; and orders relator confined "for a period of 90 days on each count, to be served concurrently and thereafter until he pays $400 on arre[ars]." (2) Attached to the order is a work release whereby relator is ordered released from custody to look for employment and to appear before the district court on December 5, 1990, for a hearing to review his compliance with the court's orders. The sheriff's statement shows that relator was incarcerated on October 24, 1990, and has a scheduled release date of January 21, 1991.
In his petition and amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus, relator asserts that the civil portion of the contempt judgment is void because he is unable to pay the $400 in past-due child support. Relator cannot be imprisoned if he does not have the means by which to purge himself of the contempt because to do so would authorize the trial court to confine him for life. Ex parte De Wees, 210 S.W.2d 145 (Tex. 1948). The evidence at the hearing must conclusively establish that relator did not have, and had no source from which he might reasonably be expected to obtain, the arrears. Ex parte Rohleder, 424 S.W.2d 891 (Tex. 1967); Ex parte Cummings, 610 S.W.2d 238 (Tex. Civ. App. 1980, orig. proceeding).
Relator has not, however, filed in this proceeding a statement of facts from the hearing in the district court. See Rule 120(b)(7). In the absence of a statement of facts, this Court cannot determine whether relator met his burden in district court to establish the impossibility of performance. Ex parte Chennault, 776 S.W.2d 703 (Tex. App. 1989, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Alderson, 623 S.W.2d 751 (Tex. App. 1981, orig. proceeding); see Ex parte Linder, 783 S.W.2d 754, 760 (Tex. App. 1990, orig. proceeding). Furthermore, relator has not filed an affidavit to support the factual allegations contained in his petition filed in this Court. See Rule 120(b)(8); Ex parte Mabry, 792 S.W.2d 588 (Tex. App. 1990, orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, relator has not met his burden to establish his right to relief. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.
[Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and Jones]
Filed: January 16, 1991
[Do Not Publish]
1. Van Gilst was represented by the Child Support Enforcement Division of the Office of the Attorney General in the proceeding below and has not filed a response in this proceeding. Relator appears pro se.
2. The copy of the order filed here is a recommendation of the master and does not include a signed order adopting master's report. Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 14.82 (Supp. 1991); Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 54.013 (1988). Because relator does not complain of the order, we will presume that he is incarcerated pursuant to a written order of the district court. See Ex parte Martinez, 331 S.W.2d 209 (Tex. 1960).