TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-95-00658-CR
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
NO. 4162, HONORABLE JOHN E. SUTTON, JUDGE PRESIDING
Appellant pleaded guilty to an indictment accusing him of unauthorized use of a vehicle. He also pleaded true to enhancement paragraphs alleging two previous felony convictions. The district court found that the evidence substantiated appellant's guilt and, pursuant to a plea bargain, deferred further proceedings and placed appellant on community supervision. Later, the court revoked supervision on the State's motion, adjudicated appellant guilty, and assessed punishment, enhanced by the previous convictions, at imprisonment for fifty-three years. Appellant filed a general notice of appeal.
Appellant's brief contains two points of error by which he contends the district court failed to consider the entire punishment range in assessing punishment and that the evidence is factually insufficient to support the punishment assessed. These points neither raise a jurisdictional issue nor challenge the voluntariness of the guilty plea. We are without jurisdiction to consider either point of error. Watson v. State, 924 S.W.2d 711, 714-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Lyon v. State, 872 S.W.2d 732, 736 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994); Davis v. State, 870 S.W.2d 43, 46 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994); Hutchins v. State, 887 S.W.2d 207, 209 (Tex. App.--Austin 1994, pet. ref'd); Tex. R. App. P. 40(b)(1).
The appeal is dismissed.
Before Justices Powers, Jones and Kidd
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: April 24, 1997
Do Not Publish