TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. J-16,204, HONORABLE W. JEANNE MEURER, JUDGE PRESIDING
B.M.'s appointed counsel on appeal has filed a brief asserting that the appeal is frivolous. The brief complies with the requirements for such briefs discussed in In Re D.A.S., 41 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1148 (July 3, 1998), and, more generally, in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel states that she has diligently examined the record and researched the law applicable to the facts and issues in the case. Counsel's brief contains a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable errors to be advanced. A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to B.M. and to his parent, and they were advised of their right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
We have independently reviewed the record and agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous. The order is affirmed.
Bea Ann Smith, Justice
Before Justices Powers, Kidd and B. A. Smith
Affirmed
Filed: September 24, 1998
Do Not Publish