PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. López, Justice
Catherine Stone, Justice
Paul W. Green, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 20, 2002
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal seeking to appeal the trial court's order denying his writ of habeas corpus. Because our record does not contain a signed written order, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Elliott v. State, 412 S.W.2d 320, 320 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967); Nikrasch v. State, 698 S.W.2d 443, 450 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1985, no writ). On October 7, 2002, we struck appellant's pro se response because appellant is represented by counsel on appeal and is not entitled to hybrid representation. Rudd v.
State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Appellant's counsel has not responded to our order. The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH