i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-08-00583-CV
Jerry WANZER,
Appellant
v.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE – INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, et al.,
Appellees
From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas
Trial Court No. 04-03-00051-CVK
Honorable David Peeples, Judge Presiding1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 15, 2008
DISMISSED
From our initial review of the record it appeared that the order sought to be appealed is
interlocutory because it does not dispose of a pending claim for attorney’s fees, and no severance
order appears in the record. Therefore, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this
1
… Sitting by assignment.
04-08-00583-CV
appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant’s response acknowledged the
pending claim for attorney’s fees. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the order
signed on March 27, 2006 is not a final and appealable judgment because it does not dispose of all
parties and causes of action in this suit. Therefore, we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal. See
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed
for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX . R. APP . P. 42.3(a).
PER CURIAM
-2-