In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-02-00109-CV ______________________________
PAUL PIERE, III, Appellant
V.
MARY PIERE AND VALERIE C. PIERE, Appellees
On Appeal from the 165th Judicial District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court No. 2000-48967
Before Morriss, C.J., Grant and Ross, JJ. Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
O P I N I O N
Paul Piere, III, appeals the dismissal of his suit against Mary Piere and Valerie C. Piere. Paul sued Mary and Valerie, his sisters, alleging causes of action for fraud, conspiracy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress arising from the disposition of the estate of their father, Paul Piere, Jr.
On April 1, 2002, the trial court signed an order dismissing the suit with prejudice, making Paul's notice of appeal due by May 1, 2002. (1) See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Paul filed his notice of appeal on June 10, 2002. Because the notice of appeal was not timely filed, this Court is without jurisdiction over the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: September 4, 2002
Date Decided: September 5, 2002
Do Not Publish
1. Had Paul filed a timely motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate, or request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, the notice of appeal deadline would have been July 1, 2002. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(b); Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). No such motion is contained in the clerk's record.
:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"/>
|
|
In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-10-00043-CR
______________________________
CALVIN WAYNE BURNHAM, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 123rd Judicial District Court
Panola County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2005-C-0006
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Calvin Wayne Burnham appeals from his convictions by the trial court on four charges of aggravated sexual assault of a child and four charges of indecency with a child. Burnham has filed a single brief, in which he raises issues common to all of his appeals.[1] He argues that the trial court committed reversible error in considering evidence from a previous revocation hearing when granting the States second amended motion to adjudicate guilt and in admitting the results of a polygraph examination. Burnham also complains that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he violated any conditions of his community supervision.
We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date on Burnhams appeal in cause number 06-10-00038-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that reversible error has not been shown in this case.
We affirm the trial courts judgment.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: December 14, 2010
Date Decided: December 15, 2010
Do Not Publish
[1]Burnham appeals from four convictions for aggravated sexual assault of a child and four convictions for indecency with a child, cause numbers 06-10-00038-CR through 06-10-00045-CR.