Daniel Keith Broussard v. State

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont



____________________



NO. 09-04-085 CR

____________________



DANIEL KEITH BROUSSARD, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 235976




MEMORANDUM OPINION (1)

On May 20, 2004, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why he needed time for filing the record. The appellant notified the trial court clerk that the appellant did not desire to pursue the appeal. It appears that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM



Opinion Delivered July 8, 2004

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Burgess and Gaultney, JJ.

1. Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.