In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
____________________
NO. 09-06-308 CR
____________________
CHARLES VERNON YORK, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 87922
Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant Charles Vernon York pled guilty to felony criminal mischief. The trial court deferred further proceedings, placed York on community supervision for three years, and assessed a fine of $500. On January 4, 2006, the State filed a motion to revoke York's unadjudicated community supervision. York pled true to violating two of the conditions of the community supervision order. The trial court found that York
violated the conditions of his community supervision, found York guilty of felony criminal mischief, and assessed punishment at eighteen months of confinement in a state jail facility. York's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On December 14, 2006, we granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from appellant. We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment. (1)
AFFIRMED.
_________________________________
HOLLIS HORTON
Justice
Submitted on April 6, 2007
Opinion Delivered April 18, 2007
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.
1. Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary
review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.