Ex Parte Wesley Vinson

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________



NO. 09-09-00304-CR

_____________________



EX PARTE WESLEY VINSON




On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2280 (09-05673)




MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 29, 2009, the trial court denied Wesley Vinson's application for writ of habeas corpus without conducting an evidentiary hearing or issuing the writ of habeas corpus. We questioned our jurisdiction over the appeal. Vinson filed a response labeled "writ of mandamus" in which he argues the merits of his application for writ of habeas corpus without first establishing that the order is appealable.

No appeal lies from the refusal to issue a writ of habeas corpus unless the trial court rules on the merits of the application. Ex parte Hargett, 819 S.W.2d 866 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Ex parte Noe, 646 S.W.2d 230 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983). In this case, it does not appear that the trial court addressed the merits of the application. The trial court did not issue a writ of habeas corpus, nor did the court conduct an evidentiary hearing on the application for the writ. Compare Ex parte Silva, 968 S.W.2d 367 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Ex parte McCullough, 966 S.W.2d 529 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). We conclude we have no jurisdiction over this appeal. (1) Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

DAVID GAULTNEY

Justice

Opinion Delivered August 26, 2009

Do Not Publish



Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.

1. Even if we were to read the appellant's response broadly as a request for a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to consider the merits of the application, the response in this case does not present a sufficient basis for this Court to grant that request.