Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 4, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00183-CR
____________
MARIO MONTEZ ROGERS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 337th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 966,813
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a guilty plea to aggravated assault, and the trial court placed him on six years= deferred adjudication community supervision. Thereafter, the State moved to adjudicate appellant=s guilt, and appellant pleaded true to the allegations in the State=s motion. The trial court found appellant guilty and assessed eight years= confinement and a $500 fine. Appellant filed a written notice of appeal.
Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and no motion to review the record or pro se response has been filed.
We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the State.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed August 4, 2005.
Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Seymore, and Guzman.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).