Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 1, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
_______________
NO. 14-03-00453-CR
_______________
DWAYNE ANDRE TYSON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
___________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 337th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 906,330
___________________________________________________
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Dwayne Tyson appeals a conviction for aggravated robbery on the ground that the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash the indictment because it failed to identify what kind of property he was accused of taking in the robbery.
Although appellant=s motion to quash asserted generally that the indictment did not provide sufficient notice of the charged offense, it did not indicate how or in what respect(s) the indictment failed to give such notice. Nor have we found any other portion of the record where appellant requested or obtained a ruling from the trial court on the indictment=s failure to describe the property that was the subject of the offense. Accordingly, the complaint he raises on appeal presents nothing for our review, appellant=s two issues are overruled, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
/s/ Richard H. Edelman
Justice
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed March 1, 2005.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Edelman and Seymore.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).