Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 2, 2007.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-01036-CR
____________
SHANNON W. HARDEN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 12
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1339843
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to possession of less than two ounces of marijuana. In accordance with a plea bargain agreement, the trial court deferred a finding of guilt and placed appellant on community supervision for six months. The State subsequently moved to adjudicate appellant=s guilt. After a hearing, the trial court adjudicated appellant=s guilt and on November 7, 2006, sentenced him to confinement for 180 days in the Harris County Jail. Appellant filed a timely, written notice of appeal.
Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than sixty days has elapsed and no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed August 2, 2007.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Seymore.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).