USCA1 Opinion
December 8, 1992 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
___________________
No. 92-1831
PABLO CARPIO-REYES,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Respondent.
__________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
___________________
Before
Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Torruella and Cyr, Circuit Judges.
______________
___________________
Pablo Carpio-Reyes on brief pro se.
__________________
Daniel F. Lopez-Romo, United States Attorney, Edwin O.
______________________ ________
Vazquez, Assistant United States Attorney, and Jose A. Quiles-
_______ ________________
Espinosa on Motion for Summary Disposition and Memorandum of Law
________
in Support.
__________________
__________________
Per Curiam. In view of the Supreme Court's recent
__________
decision in United States v. Wilson, 112 S. Ct. 1351 (1992), which
_______________________
concluded that it is the Attorney General -- and not the court --
who decides whether time spent in detention will be credited
towards a sentence, the district court properly denied
appellant's motion for credit for time spent on bond.
Affirmed.
________